[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: boingGraph available in anarchy (was Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2
From: |
Sven N. Thommesen |
Subject: |
Re: boingGraph available in anarchy (was Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2) |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jul 1998 20:50:26 -0500 |
At 06:52 PM 7/14/98 -0600, Alex wrote:
>
>Regarding source to GraphLib:
>
>Paul Girard <address@hidden> from SAIC has brought to our
>attention a problem with the algorithm used to position the nodes on
>the Canvas graph in GraphLib (of the two demos - this feature is
>*only* used in DynamicGraph, and only affects the position on the
>Canvas and not the underlying data structure). We are currently
>working on merging this change into GraphLib itself. Paul Girard has
>also kindly provided us with a corrected version that fixes the
>incorrectly formulated algorithm available at:
>
> ftp://ftp.santafe.edu/pub/swarm/users-contrib/anarchy/boingGraph.tar.gz
>
>I too, am loathe to modify a library to compensate for a compiler bug,
>especially when it's using a call to a nice well-behaved, well-tested
>library like math.h. As has been pointed out by Paul et. al. it looks
>like this particular issue with RedHat can be fixed by upgrading to:
>
> glibc-devel-2.0.7-13
>
Possibly not! (See my companion message.) Please let me know when the
updated version of GraphLib is ready.
>My initial reaction was rather like Sven's, i.e. to just fix the
>problem in GraphLib. However, the *good thing* about fixing these
>kinds of problems at the level of the OS, is that it fixes the problem
>for *all* apps that use `pow' or other such mathlib routines.
>
Certainly. Depends on whether one has the resources and time to dig down to
the metal, I suppose. I admire the way you two do that at the drop of a
hat! The rest of us are just trying to get a little simulatin' done ;-)
If we *do* confirm the continued existence of a bug, y'all can either chase
it down, or report the bug to RedHat and let them pursue it!
>I would be a little concerned about publishing any simulation results
>if I knew that there was a bug in such a fundamental library as
>mathlib - since where there is one visible bug - there often lurk
>three in hiding...
>
I definitely agree there.
>Regards,
>
> --- Alex
TTYL,
Sven
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
==================================
- compiling DynamicGraph-1.2, Sven N. Thommesen, 1998/07/13
- Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/07/13
- Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2, Sven N. Thommesen, 1998/07/13
- Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/07/13
- Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2, Sven N. Thommesen, 1998/07/13
- Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/07/13
- Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2, Sven N. Thommesen, 1998/07/13
- Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/07/13
- boingGraph available in anarchy (was Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2), Alex Lancaster, 1998/07/14
- Re: boingGraph available in anarchy (was Re: compiling DynamicGraph-1.2),
Sven N. Thommesen <=
- Dynamic Graph works (kinda) on Redhat 5.1, Paul Johnson, 1998/07/14
- Re: Dynamic Graph works (kinda) on Redhat 5.1, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/07/15
- Re: Dynamic Graph works (kinda) on Redhat 5.1, Sven N. Thommesen, 1998/07/15
- Re: Dynamic Graph works (all the way) on Redhat 5.1, Paul Johnson, 1998/07/15
- Re: Dynamic Graph works (all the way) on Redhat 5.1, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/07/15
- Re: Dynamic Graph works (all the way) on Redhat 5.1, Sven N. Thommesen, 1998/07/15
- Re: Dynamic Graph works (all the way) on Redhat 5.1, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/07/16