Re: `:export' attribute?: Re: Experimental public branch for inline special blocks

[Ihor Radchenko]

Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:

>> I am not following this branch of the discussion closely, but what about
>> not inviting a new DSL here and instead using Elisp sexps here?
>> Something like (latex body) (html none) ((not (or latex html)) contents)
>
> I do not mind in general. Just a couple of questions:
> - How to specify whether the rule should be applied to derived backends?
> - Is there a ready to use function that can interpret such expressions?

Good question. I guess that what I propose is still a new DSL at the
end... Oh well.

I guess that the closest existing DSL would be what `buffer-match-p'
function uses.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>