Re: Probably stupid problem...

[Al Arduengo]

What? You mean Electric can't do *everything* I want?  Sheesh! What
good is software that doesn't do *everything*!?

Actually though, doesn't Electric offer some sort of spice simulation
interaction? I remember older versions offering access to spice plots
or something like that.  I tried the spice layout example in
samples.txt but again I cannot get any real access to the spice
results from Electric.  Or is it that Electric is currently only doing
netlist generation?

Thanks for humoring me.
-Al

Steven Rubin <address@hidden> writes:

> >And while I am here, I have a question about spice interaction.  I
> >created a schematic with the schematic technology.  When I tell
> >electric to write the deck, it does so and calls spice3 (set in the
> >spice options menu) and after being asked if this is a simulation of
> >the facet and answering yes, a simulation window pops up. Typing 'a'
> >to add a signal presents me with no choices. I made exports for the
> >signal of interest but they do not show up.  I added a control deck
> >for running a simple tran sweep but I still can't get anything in the
> >sim window.  What could I be missing?
> 
> Sadly, Electric's SPICE parser does not understand sweeps.  This will
> be added soon.
> 
> 
>     -Steven Rubin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnu-electric mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnu-electric
> 

-- 
"It aint what ya don't know but what ya know that aint so
that can get you in trouble." - P. Thomas