[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging multitty
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Merging multitty |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2007 21:39:57 -0400 |
> If a function is new in the multi-tty branch, the only change log it
> needs now is "new function". If you added on date A, and changed it
> on date B, the entry for date B can usually be deleted.
>=20
> I am not sure a program could make these simplifications.
Do you mean that we can simplify ChangeLog as well, or do you want this
shortening to only apply to the CVS logs?
This simplification can be done in ChangeLog too.
So I guess we could use a program to split it up file by file,
and run that program on the hand-simplified ChangeLog file.
- Re: Merging multitty, (continued)
- Re: Merging multitty, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Karoly Lorentey, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Kim F. Storm, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/15
- Re: Merging multitty, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/15
- Message not available
- Re: Merging multitty,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, David Kastrup, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, David Kastrup, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, Karl Fogel, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, Ken Manheimer, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/10
- Re: Reordering etc/NEWS, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/11