[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in server-start
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: bug in server-start |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:05:32 +0100 |
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 21:59, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> wrote:
> You could have said so in the beginning, without all this drawn out,
> pointless, nonsense.
Ridiculous: I hate writing docstrings, but I still think that showing
the server-name is the Right Thing To Do, which is what I was
defending. At *no point* I've said or implied that I though my wording
could not be enhanced (quite the contrary).
> Given that we aren't getting anywhere here, I don't want to waste any
> more time on this at the moment. I'll take care of this one (the daemon
> error message to be specific) after the code gets checked in.
How like you.
Juanma
- Re: bug in server-start, (continued)
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: bug in server-start, Chong Yidong, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/15
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16