Re: [Fsfe-uk] Activity

[John¹]

On Friday 27 February 2009 10:53:58 Alex Hudson wrote:
> I agree with the spirit of this plan: if there is a demand for such an
> organisation, it could certainly happen that way. I'm not sure what
> structural changes would be needed to make it successful though: the
> real need is active members, so I think the real question is whether or
> not such an organisation is in demand and viable.
>
> I don't think there's anything standing in the way of AFFS becoming
> something different, something replacing AFFS, or the whole thing just
> going away. It just comes down to having a group of people who are
> sufficiently motivated and who have sufficient time to put something
> together. Someone pick an option and run with it, I guess.

Are you, (Alex Hudson), one of the five existing subscribing members, if 
not, then I am of the opinion that any plans for the future of the AFFS 
lie in the hands of those who are still subscribing members. Perhaps they 
would like to make themselves known?

-- 
John Seago
GNU/Linux Registered User No. #219566 http://counter.li.org/