Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: DARCS

[Bruce Stephens]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

> As for whether you want /wrapper/{{arch},source/...} or source/{{arch},...}
> there are again several reasons I dislike the wrapper approach:
>
>   (1) An extra wrapper dir is just another bit of noise to deal with --
>       and unlike {arch}-in-the-source-dir, it's one I _often_ have to
>       deal with, since I type pathnames in source trees far more often
>       than I do things that run afoul of {arch}.
>
>   (2) It's an annoying little inconsistency between traditional project
>       trees and CM'd project trees, and every little thing like that
>       requires brain state to keep track of and changes in tools to
>       account for them.

It would provide a natural place to put build trees.