Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory

[Charles Duffy]

On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 01:50, Miles Bader wrote:
> Well tla has to look _somewhere_ to find out more info about the current
> project, so it has to have some standard places to look (as I said
> before, it can't be an end-user option, because names underneath that
> directory are stored in changesets).  A set of standard names like
> `{arch}' and `.arch' might make most people happy.

I suspect, however, that supporting two such "standards" is the sort of
thing that users in the future will be prone to looking back on as
accreted cruft.

Which is to say: I'd take the worse of them (and no, I'm not specifying
which I think that is) over having *both* of them.