[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044) |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:58:29 -0400 |
Hi all,
>>> Let me summarize:
>>>
>>> OLD NEW
>>> 3/4
>>> f4 r8 f8[ f f] f4 r8 f8 f8[ f]
>>> f4. f8[ b8. a16] f4. f8 b8.[ a16]
>>>
>>> 4/4
>>> r8 f8[ f f] f8[ f f f] r8 f8 f8[ f] f8[ f f f]
>>>
>>> So are these beaming rules correct, or at least better than the
>>> old ones?
>>
>> I think they are better than the old ones, but I'd prefer
>> to hear opinions from some real musicians.
> I agree on both counts.
+1
Thanks,
Kieren.
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/16
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/16
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/06/19
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/06/19
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/20
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/22
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/06/22
- Re: Revised autobeam settings patch -- cleaned up debug comments (issue1667044), n . puttock, 2010/06/27