Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1

[Ken Hornstein]

>To clarify, I'm not suggesting dropping the CMU SASL support.
>What I meant to say is that we should include a light weight SASL
>implementation as I described that would be built iff CMU SASL support
>was not enabled in the build.

I don't necessarily object to someone doing that work ... it's just a)
more work than I think you realize, given that we already have CMU SASL
support and it would have to integrate with that somehow, and b) I think
nowadays getting a CMU SASL library is not a big deal for most platforms
(it either ships with a lot of systems or is easily available via a
packaging system).

So if someone wants to work on it, please feel free.  It's just not something
that will make it onto my personal to-do list.

--Ken