Re: [Audio-video] http://audio-video.gnu.org/video/ghm2013/Samuel_Thibault_Jean-Philippe_Mengual-Freedom_0_for_everybody_really_.text

[MENGUAL Jean-Philippe]

Hi,

Would a "agreement" like this fit:
0. FSF and "Freedom 0" promote free software. "Freedom 0" accepts the 
FSF meaning om the freedom 0, and the FSF accepts to encourage free 
software devs to have an accessible code, that is a code clean enough to 
enable an assistive technology to interact with it (typically, clean 
enough to enable to an a11y bus    such as at-spi to connect to it).
1. "Freedom 0" shall never say that a proprietary program is better than 
a free one, even if the free one is not accessible.
2. "Freedom 0" will be able to explain its meaning of freedom 0 to free 
software devs, however it shall always encourage users to prefer free 
software, supporting them using free software and make it accessible as 
much as possible at their level. "Freedom 0" will always encourage users 
to support free software to improve their accessibility.
3. "Freedom 0" will support all the initiatives in free software:
a) To make accessible a software
b) To create functionalities of assistive technologies

Is it a good synthetis of our exchanges (I assume the Samuel's mail was 
clear enough to make you understand exactly our message and our meaning 
of accessibility)?

Regards,





--

Jean-Philippe MENGUAL

accelibreinfo, votre partenaire en informatique adaptée aux déficients visuels

Mail:address@hidden

Site Web:http://www.accelibreinfo.eu