Re: [glob2-devel] Language demands

[Bo Lorentsen]

Martin Voelkle wrote:

> Since you maintain the call stack, you just need to push the address of
> the instruction after the call (don't use a pointer if you want to be
> able to save/restore it), jump to the address of the call and do the
> reverse on method return.
>  
Thanks for the hint, this was what i intented. I use a index possition 
as a PC (vector iterator), and will store return addresses as this, too. 
But you are right, pointers are a pitfall :-)

> Treat these external functions as atomic instructions and make sure they
> don't call script functions. Since they are part of glob2, we can trust
> them as for bugs (hopefully).
>  
Yeps, loopback to the language will go wrong :-)

> I'm sorry, I don't see that kind of wording in the license:
> http://www.lua.org/license.html
>  
My fault, it was words i found in there FAQ, sorry 
(http://www.lua.org/faq.html#1.7) !

/BL