glob2-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [glob2-devel] Language demands


From: Stephane Magnenat
Subject: Re: [glob2-devel] Language demands
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:52:13 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.8.1

> The instruction counter limitation !

Yes

> void executeSome( Context &, unsigned nNumOfInstuctions )
>
> The only problem is when the script start calling functions (even TEA
> functions) as this will bemand a preemtion to preserve the stack (I use
> the call stack for TEA calls too). I quess SGSL have the same problem.

SGSL is too simple to have this problem ! You can't define any new function in 
SGSL, so an "instruction" is in fact a line of script.

> If i LGPL it, glob2 can use and link with it as it/we please, but I will
> not be able to use static linking at my current job, and that is plain
> silly (I could also use dual license, but that is just another ogly idea).

Why ? Does LGPL prevent static linking with proprietary stuff ?

Thanks for you work on TEA,

Steph




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]