gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla


From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:10:41 +1100

On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 17:58 -0500, Adrian Irving-Beer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 09:22:57AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> > It has an X bit. And the system can run any arbitrarily named file.
> 
> So are executables given an .exe extension so you can run them
> outside Cygwin? 

Yes, and for consistency : cygwin doesn't try to make windows into unix,
just to bring unix tools and capabilities to windows.

>  Or is this a historical Win95 issue (which didn't
> have ACLs, IIRC)?

Right, FAT has no acls. Indeed, win95 doesn't even have an isolated
kernel.

Rob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]