[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about GNU Hurd
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: about GNU Hurd |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:35:08 -0400 |
Linux has no choice but to stick with GPLv2 as they removed the `or any
later version' clause, and therefore to change the license to GPLv3
would require the consent of all the copyright holders. But to be honest
the license doesn't matter that much, as long as it is free.
Our lawyers think that they can relicense Linux if they want to.
It is important to do this, to protect the users from tivoization.
- about GNU Hurd, arnuld, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Daniel Martin, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Daniel Martin, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Jonathan Carter, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Daniel Martin, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, arnuld, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Banck, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, arnuld, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Michael Banck, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Jonathan Carter, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/16
- Re: about GNU Hurd, arnuld, 2007/07/17
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/17
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: about GNU Hurd, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/07/20
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/21
- Re: about GNU Hurd, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/21
- Re: about GNU Hurd, arnuld, 2007/07/21