[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new smaller installers to test
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: new smaller installers to test |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:43:37 +0000 |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I've tweaked the list of dirs to remove from
>> share/ghostscript/Resources. The resulting files are (on average) 5
>> megs smaller. linux-x86 works here for me.
>
> It looks as if this directory contains various character encoding
> related stuff. Can you run this through a couple of CJK files to see
> if that keeps working?
Umm... maybe? A quick google search suggests that CJK are Asian fonts?
...
woah, this is weird. The 2.13.12 regtest comparison shows them just fine:
http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.12-1/compare-v2.13.11-1/index.html
(you can see the hiragana in utf-8.ly)
the 2.13.13 regest doesn't show them changing:
http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.13-1/compare-v2.13.12-1/index.html
however, they're missing from the 2.13.13 input/regression:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/input/regression/df/lily-5e79810b.png
I don't have the uploads/ files in my gub dir any more, so I can't
track it down further. But I'm really surprised about the regtest
comparison not showing anything!
Anybody have suggestions? I could simply revert the change, but it
seemed that people liked the idea of saving some space. Does anybody
know ghostscript and want to suggest which of these dirs I should try
keeping?
+ 'share/ghostscript/*/Resource/{CMap,ColorSpace,Decoding}/',
+ 'share/ghostscript/*/Resource/{Encoding,Font,SubstCID}/',
I don't know offhand how large each of those dirs are, but if it would
help, I could build the package with the stripping commented out, and
tell you exactly which files there are, and where they are.
Cheers,
- Graham
- new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/12
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Trevor Daniels, 2010/02/12
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/12
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/17
- Re: new smaller installers to test,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/18
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Graham Percival, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Patrick McCarty, 2010/02/19
- Re: new smaller installers to test, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/02/19