[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of MacOSX
From: |
Bill Northcott |
Subject: |
Re: Status of MacOSX |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:48:57 +1100 |
I guess it comes down to how much you believe my target for a workable
version - currently January 31st!
Bill Northcott
address@hidden wrote on 22/01/2003 12:00:48 PM:
> I have been reading now and then the work being done on MacOSX. I'm
glad to
> hear that there is interest in this port.
> Since so much of the conversation to date has been deep in context and
since
> I don't have familiarity with OSX...is it safe to assume that OSX is
still
> not swarm-friendly?
> I am going to have to rewrite and rerun parts of my simulation for an
> upcoming project, and I want to implement a hardware and version freeze.
> Since I have to pick my hardware soon, I have to make the decision
between a
> Mac (which I prefer) and a linux box, since windows is far too slow for
my
> needs.
> Thanks!
> Darold Higa
>
> ==================================
> Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
> to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
> [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
> with "help" in the body of the message.
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- Re: Windows XP II, (continued)
- Re: Windows XP II, Paul Johnson, 2003/01/21
- Re: Windows XP II, Steve Railsback, 2003/01/21
- Status of MacOSX, Darold Higa, 2003/01/21
- Re: Status of MacOSX, Alex Lancaster, 2003/01/21
- Re: Status of MacOSX, Russell Standish, 2003/01/21
- Re: Status of MacOSX, Bill Northcott, 2003/01/21
- RE: Status of MacOSX, Darold Higa, 2003/01/22
- RE: Status of MacOSX, gepr, 2003/01/22
- Re: Status of MacOSX, jacobo_myerston, 2003/01/22
- Re: Status of MacOSX,
Bill Northcott <=