[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of MacOSX
From: |
Bill Northcott |
Subject: |
Re: Status of MacOSX |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:09:41 +1100 |
> Why not do both? Macs will run a version of Linux natively (eg
> LinuxPPC which is a Redhat distribution). This has the advantage of
> having a working Swarm environment, better graphics speed (I
> understand). You can OSX for other stuff as needs be (eg Acrobat
> reader is not available for LinuxPPC). OSX & Linux
> should work together better than does Windows & Linux dual boot
> systems.
I think the fact that it used to work is LinuxPPC's only advantage, now
Apple have fixed the X11 speed.
OTOH you have the usual slew of standard office and econetric stuff
available for MacOS X.
Dual booting means stopping everything else while you do a Swarm build or
run.
It really makes more sense to run Swarm on a cheap Linux PC and drive it
via VNC on the Mac. I can see no advantages for the dual boot Mac over
that set up.
Bill Northcott
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- Windows XP II, DAVID CAMACHO, 2003/01/21
- Re: Windows XP II, Paul Johnson, 2003/01/21
- Re: Windows XP II, Steve Railsback, 2003/01/21
- Status of MacOSX, Darold Higa, 2003/01/21
- Re: Status of MacOSX, Alex Lancaster, 2003/01/21
- Re: Status of MacOSX, Russell Standish, 2003/01/21
- Re: Status of MacOSX,
Bill Northcott <=
- RE: Status of MacOSX, Darold Higa, 2003/01/22
- RE: Status of MacOSX, gepr, 2003/01/22
- Re: Status of MacOSX, jacobo_myerston, 2003/01/22
- Re: Status of MacOSX, Bill Northcott, 2003/01/21