Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Fri Mar 31 2006 14:56:05 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• March 31, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] To whom it may concern: Working on TinT, Harri Haataja, 14:56
  • [Chicken-users] Chickenizing Sauerbraten, Brandon J. Van Every, 14:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, Brandon J. Van Every, 13:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, felix winkelmann, 07:27
  • [Chicken-users] --exact-version, Brandon J. Van Every, 03:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, Peter Busser, 02:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, Brandon J. Van Every, 01:45
  • [Chicken-users] stream-wiki doesn't like CR/LF's, etc., Shawn Rutledge, 01:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, felix winkelmann, 01:34
  • [Chicken-users] repo news, eggs, felix winkelmann, 01:33
  • Re: [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, Brandon J. Van Every, 01:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, felix winkelmann, 01:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake 2.4 shipping soon, felix winkelmann, 01:20
• March 30, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, Nelson Castillo, 20:05
  • [Chicken-users] calling all regex gurus, Brandon J. Van Every, 19:58
  • [Chicken-users] CMake 2.4 shipping soon, Brandon J. Van Every, 17:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg versions, felix winkelmann, 01:12
• March 29, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., Alex Shinn, 20:06
  • [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., Hans Bulfone, 19:40
  • [Chicken-users] egg versions, Hans Bulfone, 18:34
  • [Chicken-users] MSLUG meeting moved, Dominique Boucher, 08:15
• March 28, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Matthew David Parker, 11:27
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Which came first, the chicken or the egg?, Brandon J. Van Every, 11:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Which came first, the chicken or the egg?, John Cowan, 07:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] fun porting to irix 6.5.21m, felix winkelmann, 07:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with darcs repo?, felix winkelmann, 07:19
  • [Chicken-users] Re: Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Matthias Heiler, 04:13
  • [Chicken-users] Which came first, the chicken or the egg?, Brandon J. Van Every, 03:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with darcs repo?, Sven . Hartrumpf, 03:15
  • [Chicken-users] fun porting to irix 6.5.21m, freddyisaac, 02:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}, Brandon J. Van Every, 02:07
  • Re: Chicken build system (Was: Re: [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}), felix winkelmann, 01:47
  • Chicken build system (Was: Re: [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}), Peter Busser, 01:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] more problems with macro expansion in a compiled binary, Shawn Rutledge, 01:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}, felix winkelmann, 01:27
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}, Brandon J. Van Every, 01:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}, felix winkelmann, 00:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] more problems with macro expansion in a compiled binary, Shawn Rutledge, 00:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}, Brandon J. Van Every, 00:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}, felix winkelmann, 00:28
  • [Chicken-users] ${DISTFILES}, Brandon J. Van Every, 00:11
• March 27, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Brandon J. Van Every, 23:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Brandon J. Van Every, 23:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] more problems with macro expansion in a compiled binary, felix winkelmann, 21:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, felix winkelmann, 21:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compiler or interpreter?, felix winkelmann, 21:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with darcs repo?, felix winkelmann, 21:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compiler or interpreter?, John Cowan, 21:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compiler or interpreter?, Alex Shinn, 20:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Compiler or interpreter?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 20:24
  • [Chicken-users] Compiler or interpreter?, John Cowan, 17:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Matthew David Parker, 12:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, John Cowan, 12:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Shawn Rutledge, 12:53
  • [Chicken-users] CMakeLists.txt updated in darcs, Brandon J. Van Every, 12:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] import, the utf8 egg, syntax-case and tinyclos, Sunnan, 12:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] spiffy parameters, Shawn Rutledge, 12:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] state of tinyclos ?, Alex Shinn, 12:15
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Matthew David Parker, 11:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Brandon J. Van Every, 11:46
  • [Chicken-users] Advantages of CHICKEN over Gambit-C, Matthew David Parker, 11:17
  • Re: [Chicken-users] more problems with macro expansion in a compiled binary, Shawn Rutledge, 02:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] more problems with macro expansion in a compiled binary, felix winkelmann, 02:15
  • [Chicken-users] more problems with macro expansion in a compiled binary, Shawn Rutledge, 02:09
• March 26, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Trapping Scheme-level errors, John Cowan, 13:42
  • [Chicken-users] Problems with darcs repo?, Reed Sheridan, 07:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Trapping Scheme-level errors, felix winkelmann, 03:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] string-split-fields, felix winkelmann, 03:05
  • [Chicken-users] Trapping Scheme-level errors, John Cowan, 00:24
• March 25, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] import, the utf8 egg, syntax-case and tinyclos, Sunnan, 12:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] import, the utf8 egg, syntax-case and tinyclos, felix winkelmann, 11:03
  • [Chicken-users] string-split-fields, Sunnan, 07:21
  • [Chicken-users] syntax-case tinyclos redux, Sunnan, 06:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: https, F. Wittenberger, 04:59
  • [Chicken-users] Re: https, Mario Domenech Goulart, 00:23
• March 24, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] objc/cocoa and deploying, Ben Matasar, 21:50
  • [Chicken-users] https, Daishi Kato, 12:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] import, the utf8 egg, syntax-case and tinyclos, felix winkelmann, 05:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] state of tinyclos ?, Alex Shinn, 03:48
• March 23, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] import, the utf8 egg, syntax-case and tinyclos, Sunnan, 07:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] spiffy parameters, felix winkelmann, 05:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] spiffy parameters, Peter Bex, 05:44
  • Re: [Chicken-users] spiffy parameters, felix winkelmann, 05:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] spiffy parameters, Peter Bex, 04:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] import, the utf8 egg, syntax-case and tinyclos, Alex Shinn, 03:13
  • [Chicken-users] import, the utf8 egg, syntax-case and tinyclos, Sunnan, 02:57
  • [Chicken-users] spiffy parameters, Shawn Rutledge, 01:32
• March 22, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.3 on Cygwin: trouble compiling an extension, felix winkelmann, 13:30
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, felix winkelmann, 13:24
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.3 on Cygwin: trouble compiling an extension, John Cowan, 13:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, Patrick Brannan, 09:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, Patrick Brannan, 09:10
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, Patrick Brannan, 09:02
• March 21, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, John Cowan, 22:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, Matthew Welland, 20:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, Patrick Brannan, 13:30
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, felix winkelmann, 12:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, John Cowan, 12:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] objc/cocoa and deploying, felix winkelmann, 12:16
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, felix winkelmann, 11:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] state of tinyclos ?, felix winkelmann, 11:42
  • [Chicken-users] Re: Read-line fix, felix winkelmann, 11:33
• March 20, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken on Wikipedia, Peter Bex, 13:45
  • [Chicken-users] state of tinyclos ?, Rick Taube, 12:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in symbolic-link? with UTF8 filenames., John Cowan, 12:17
  • [Chicken-users] Re: Read-line fix, Reed Sheridan, 11:56
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken-setup 2.3 fails on Cygwin, John Cowan, 11:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in symbolic-link? with UTF8 filenames., felix winkelmann, 11:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] objc/cocoa and deploying, Zbigniew, 11:33
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken on Wikipedia, Tony Sidaway, 11:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] tinyclos value matching?, felix winkelmann, 11:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] The symbolic-link? bug does not exist..., felix winkelmann, 07:16
  • [Chicken-users] The symbolic-link? bug does not exist..., Peter Busser, 06:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] objc/cocoa and deploying, felix winkelmann, 01:47
• March 18, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] Bug in symbolic-link? with UTF8 filenames., Peter Busser, 13:15
• March 17, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] FP egg, felix winkelmann, 06:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] objc/cocoa and deploying, felix winkelmann, 02:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] tinyclos value matching?, Alex Shinn, 02:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] complex number procedures, felix winkelmann, 02:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] tinyclos value matching?, felix winkelmann, 02:04
• March 16, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] tinyclos value matching?, Topher Cyll, 22:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] tinyclos value matching?, Alex Shinn, 22:30
  • [Chicken-users] complex number procedures, Alex Shinn, 20:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] tinyclos value matching?, felix winkelmann, 04:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Configuring readline prompt, felix winkelmann, 03:31
• March 15, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] tinyclos value matching?, Topher Cyll, 16:12
  • [Chicken-users] objc/cocoa and deploying, Ben Matasar, 12:50
  • Re: Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 12:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] problem building with pcre support, Graham Fawcett, 12:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] problem building with pcre support, Sven . Hartrumpf, 12:10
  • [Chicken-users] problem building with pcre support, Graham Fawcett, 11:19
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Configuring readline prompt, Peter Wright, 10:53
• March 14, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Configuring readline prompt, felix winkelmann, 01:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] darcs tools, felix winkelmann, 01:27
• March 13, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] darcs tools, Reed Sheridan, 17:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] darcs tools, Thomas Chust, 14:38
  • Re: Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?], Thomas Chust, 09:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 08:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Daishi Kato, 08:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Configuring readline prompt, felix winkelmann, 05:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Configuring readline prompt, Peter Wright, 04:03
  • Re: Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?], felix winkelmann, 03:25
  • Re: Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?], felix winkelmann, 03:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Configuring readline prompt, felix winkelmann, 02:44
  • [Chicken-users] darcs tools, Brandon J. Van Every, 02:24
• March 12, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] stripping accents, Thomas Chust, 18:15
  • Re: Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?], Peter Bex, 11:46
  • Re: Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 09:28
  • Re: Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?], Shawn Rutledge, 00:58
• March 11, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] stripping accents, Sunnan, 17:42
  • Wiki, [was: Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?], felix winkelmann, 16:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] yet another java interface + spiffy update, felix winkelmann, 15:55
• March 10, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 21:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Thomas Chust, 20:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, John Cowan, 16:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 15:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] SLIB init?, Kon Lovett, 13:01
  • [Chicken-users] Configuring readline prompt, Peter Wright, 11:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] SLIB init?, Tim Reid, 11:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] yet another java interface + spiffy update, Graham Fawcett, 11:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] 64 bit success stories for Chicken?, Peter Bex, 11:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] 64 bit success stories for Chicken?, Sven . Hartrumpf, 05:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] 64 bit success stories for Chicken?, Peter Bex, 05:14
  • [Chicken-users] 64 bit success stories for Chicken?, Sven . Hartrumpf, 03:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] yet another java interface + spiffy update, felix winkelmann, 02:05
  • Re: [Chicken-users] SLIB init?, felix winkelmann, 02:01
• March 09, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] SLIB init?, Tim Reid, 13:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] yet another java interface + spiffy update, Graham Fawcett, 13:27
• March 08, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] s11n and tinyclos, Kon Lovett, 22:04
  • [Chicken-users] yet another java interface + spiffy update, felix winkelmann, 14:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Mingw Makefile and Instructions, Patrick Brannan, 10:37
  • [Chicken-users] Report from the Scheme Language Steering Committee, Mitchell Wand, 02:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] s11n and tinyclos, felix winkelmann, 01:28
• March 07, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] Re: uuid egg bug report, Kon Lovett, 14:52
  • [Chicken-users] Re: uuid egg bug report, Kon Lovett, 13:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update, Thomas Chust, 12:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update, F. Wittenberger, 10:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update, Thomas Chust, 09:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update, F. Wittenberger, 09:46
  • [Chicken-users] Patch for hen, Reed Sheridan, 09:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Mingw Makefile and Instructions, felix winkelmann, 09:39
• March 06, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] New scgi egg, Thomas Chust, 17:30
  • [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update, Thomas Chust, 17:28
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Kon Lovett, 14:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Mingw Makefile and Instructions, Patrick Brannan, 13:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, felix winkelmann, 00:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] s11n and tinyclos, felix winkelmann, 00:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, felix winkelmann, 00:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hash tables in CHICKEN, felix winkelmann, 00:25
• March 05, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Thomas Chust, 08:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Thomas Chust, 08:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Reed Sheridan, 05:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Kon Lovett, 02:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] (use posix) on mac os x, Ashish Shrestha, 02:51
• March 04, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Daishi Kato, 22:28
  • Re: [Chicken-users] (use posix) on mac os x, Zbigniew, 20:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Peter Busser, 16:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Thomas Chust, 15:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Kon Lovett, 15:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Thomas Chust, 15:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Kon Lovett, 14:28
  • [Chicken-users] SRFI-12 non-compliance, Reed Sheridan, 13:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Do eggs need to be recompiled for Chicken 2.3?, felix winkelmann, 12:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hash tables in CHICKEN, Thomas Chust, 07:54
  • [Chicken-users] Thread safe hash tables?, Thomas Chust, 02:53
• March 03, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] darcs repo has a new home, felix winkelmann, 23:34
  • [Chicken-users] Hash tables in CHICKEN, Thomas Chust, 22:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Thomas Chust, 22:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 21:47
• March 02, 2006
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Mingw Makefile and Instructions, Brandon J. Van Every, 18:17
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Problem with -DPIC When Building with MinGw, felix winkelmann, 14:59
  • [Chicken-users] s11n and tinyclos, Simon St-Onge, 03:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] MINGW Build with make file and no MS Tools, Patrick Brannan, 02:34
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.3 packages for Ubuntu Breezy, Peter Busser, 00:54
• March 01, 2006
  • [Chicken-users] Mingw build instructions and makefile, Patrick Brannan, 23:53
  • [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI-12 non-compliance, felix winkelmann, 23:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Powered by Spiffy/Scheme logo?, felix winkelmann, 23:33
  • Re: [Chicken-users] MINGW Build with make file and no MS Tools, Sergey Khorev, 22:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] MINGW Build with make file and no MS Tools, Patrick Brannan, 02:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] benchmarks and test suites, felix winkelmann, 01:14

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc