Re: [Audio-video] [Liberté 0] Re: http://audio-video.gnu.org/video/ghm2

audio-video

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Audio-video] [Liberté 0] Re: http://audio-video.gnu.org/video/ghm2

From:	Garreau\, Alexandre
Subject:	Re: [Audio-video] [Liberté 0] Re: http://audio-video.gnu.org/video/ghm2013/Samuel_Thibault_Jean-Philippe_Mengual-Freedom_0_for_everybody_really_.text
Date:	Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:56:23 +0200
User-agent:	Gnus (5.13), GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Le 26/07/2014 à 06h53, Richard Stallman a écrit :
> The original source of my concern was Sam Thibault's talk last year.
> What I heard at RMLL went in the same direction.  Both claimed
> that a program that lacks accessibility is not free software.

I didn’t see yet the RMLL talks videos (I do not have enough internet
data access to watch them all currently), but I didn’t see a such claim
in Samuel’s talk… Where did you see it more precisely? At which moment?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [Audio-video] [Liberté 0] Re: http://audio-video.gnu.org/video/ghm2013/Samuel_Thibault_Jean-Philippe_Mengual-Freedom_0_for_everybody_really_.text, (continued)