[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch
From: |
Kero van Gelder |
Subject: |
Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:36:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
> > While Ruby-Wise may well be an interesting project, its goal is to
> > develop yet another widget set from scratch. Not only developping a
> > widget set is a BIIIG effort (assuming you want it state of the art) but
> > you also need a large audience to make it viable. And although the
> > Ruby community is growing, developing a widget set for the sole Ruby
> > community will never allo Ruby-Wise to reach the critical mass.
>
> i believe you are farily right about this.
I guess I have to agree. (but if there are as many toolkits as
languages, getting all ruby-users to use ruby-wise could be critical
mass :)
> but understand that my desire
> to have this backend available relates to advantages that may come from
> having a Native Ruby GUI. Ruby-Wise require only one supporting library
> (if i am not mistaken)
Xlib for X systems.
> and thus is quite light-weight giving potential
> to embeded applications per some recent discussions on Ruby-Talk.
Yes, though speed (notably, implicit calls to pack()) is an issue on
an iPAQ, atm.
> in fact this is why Ruby-Wise was created. Kero has it running on
> his handheld! but i grant you that his project has a ways to go, i
> do not readily see that Kero is on a fast paced development track.
No, there are other things I am working on: some general things for
linux-on-iPAQ; a pim-suite for iPAQ (of which he address-book uses
Ruby-Wise); a totally unrelated set of scripts for a strategic game
called VGA-Planets. Finally, I have an awful lot of holiday this year,
plus some business trips (totals 10 weeks easily).
So that certainly does not make me spend each free minute on Ruby-Wise.
> so this
> backend will have to move into the background and others to the
> forefront. but let me be clear Ruby-Wise is just another backend.
> potentially any backend will work with GUtopIa. so its not a matter of
> if, as much it is a matter of when.
Yes. I like my Ruby-Wise interface too much to give it up. Progress
will occur, but slow, at unpredictable intervals.
One major step would be to add another (low-level) graphics engine to
Ruby-Wise (preferably on Windows to gain momentum; problem is I
neither like nor run any version of windows, so I'll definitely need
help for that). Coupling Ruby-Wise to Gutopia is likely to speed up
development (extra incentive).
But, I don't have a clue where to start binding Ruby-Wise to
Gutopia...
http://www.rubygui.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GUtopIa_Common_Meta-API
at least brings me familiar idiom, but brings me no closer to what
Model bind()s to which View and vice versa. or how.
A short end-user program and its semantics would certainly help me,
if not just to start asking the right questions. I don't care whether
that uses Attribute Eval notation and later turns out Gutopia uses
Hash Notation. That's not important for the concept throught the
layers. And a minute change of code.
Bye,
Kero.
+--- Kero ------------------------------ address@hidden ---+
| Don't split your mentality without thinking twice |
| Proud like a God -- Guano Apes |
+--- M38c ---------- http://httpd.chello.nl/k.vangelder ---+
- [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Curt Hibbs, 2002/08/25
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/25
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch,
Kero van Gelder <=
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/26
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/26
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27