[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Multi-network download
From: |
Martin |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Multi-network download |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:11:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt |
Traumflug wrote...
> The other direction becomes more difficult. So I stopped mldonkey,
> deleted files.ini, copied the 96.6 % download from Azureus over the
> mldonkey temp file, restarted mldonkey, did a scan_temp and
> recover_temp. After some minutes, mldonkey recognised four chunks as
> being complete. Four *sigh*. This makes about 25 % or 70 % download
> lost.
hmm...this should not happen unless the file was modified. mldonkey
should recover all complete chunks. Whats quite possible is that the
last missing 3.4% are spread over many chunks (even 1 byte missing
could make a whole chunk corrupted) - so as azureus chunks are 256kb
and edonkey-chunks are 9.5MB this effect could render more data
useless (=not downloaded) on mldonkey than on azureus.
> So the question is, how whould you tell mldonkey about partial
> downloaded chunks? I can see the 0/1/2 notation in the single file
> view, but can't find an equivalent somewhere in the .ini files.
> mldonkey does remember it somewhere since partial downloaded chunks
> survive a mldonkey restart (unlike Azureus).
Apart from the 0/1/2 display mldonkey does not save downloaded areas
but saves *not* downloaded areas in
file_absent_chunks = [
(0, 68096000);}
That means that data is missing from file offset 0 - 68096000 bytes.
(at least afaik)
--
Before replying see www.reedmedia.net/misc/mail/using-mailing-list.html
Here's a Quarter, call somebody who cares
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., (continued)
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., mldonkey, 2004/02/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Aniruddha Shankar, 2004/02/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Traumflug, 2004/02/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., mldonkey, 2004/02/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Traumflug, 2004/02/07
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Sven Hartge, 2004/02/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., mldonkey, 2004/02/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Tristan Seligmann, 2004/02/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Pierre Etchemaite, 2004/02/07
- [Mldonkey-users] Multi-network download, Traumflug, 2004/02/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Multi-network download,
Martin <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Multi-network download, Traumflug, 2004/02/08
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Multi-network download, Sven Hartge, 2004/02/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Multi-network download, Traumflug, 2004/02/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Multi-network download, Traumflug, 2004/02/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Multi-network download, Martin, 2004/02/08
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Sven Hartge, 2004/02/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Pierre Etchemaite, 2004/02/08
Re: [Mldonkey-users] using mldonkey on VERY low-bandwidth connections..., Traumflug, 2004/02/07