human-beings-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Human-beings-discuss] primary resources


From: dams
Subject: Re: [Human-beings-discuss] primary resources
Date: 17 Apr 2002 12:20:27 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1

Yoann Padioleau <address@hidden> writes:

> Guillaume Cottenceau <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Yoann Padioleau <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > > > -keep in mind the good things from age of empire : At the beginning, 
> > > > > you don't
> > > > >  have powerfull offense, good and cheap defense, and no fast and big 
> > > > > transport
> > > > >  (mainly walking). This avoid the starcraft style "I build only 
> > > > > zealots with no
> > > > >  evolution the faster I can, to destroy quicjly the poor guy spending 
> > > > > time
> > > > >  evolving its city).
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, you've already told me so, and I like this idea very much.
> > > 
> > > I dont like it at all. It is not realistic. the first things to do is to 
> > > secure your own city, so if someone build only zealots .... and destroy 
> > > you
> > > then it is normal, "that the way life is". 
> > 
> > On the opposite, it _is_ realistic. At the very beginning of a
> > civilization, transports are very slow, massive destruction
> > weapons don't exist... think of the "fire age", it's not
> > realistic that a small tribe from somewhere could destroy all the
> > other tribes on earth.
> 
> it is not realistic that at the fire age, your society plan to build a city, 
> at that time
> i think that their plan was to eat, kill, eat, kill, ...

You forgot "have sex"



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]